Original Posted By: Les Lampman
Hi Steve,I've noticed that in trying to reply directly to a sender of a post on theList that both the 'reply to' and 'reply to all' always pick up the Listaddress whereas the 'reply to' should only go to the original sender. Notonly that but I have found no other way to ascertain the sender's emailaddress. This makes it difficult to reply to a sender's email withoutcluttering up the List.If I am doing something wrong on my end please let me know what the problemis. I'm posting this to the List in hopes that others are either having ornot having the same problem and I can find a solution.Respectfully,Les Lampman [lblampman(at)bigfoot.com]Oak Harbor, Whidbey Island, WashingtonU.S.A.________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: To Steve & All - re: email addresses
Pietenpol-List: To Steve & All - re: email addresses
Original Posted By: steve(at)byu.edu
Les,I am not sure if this is a client issue or a general list issue. I have myserver configured to reply to list, but I do allow subscribers to seeposters addresses. I am runing outlook 98 and mine behaves the same way asyou describe. If I open the message individually instead of just usingpreview mode I can see the address of the user, and can cut an past theaddr. to reply. I am also working on the Digest mode, some people wouldlike that feature.Steve E.PS. Thanks for the "attention" message to Martin. Still no word fromhim...SE-----Original Message-----LampmanSent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 7:59 AMSubject: Pietenpol-List: To Steve & All - re: email addressesHi Steve,I've noticed that in trying to reply directly to a sender of a post on theList that both the 'reply to' and 'reply to all' always pick up the Listaddress whereas the 'reply to' should only go to the original sender. Notonly that but I have found no other way to ascertain the sender's emailaddress. This makes it difficult to reply to a sender's email withoutcluttering up the List.If I am doing something wrong on my end please let me know what the problemis. I'm posting this to the List in hopes that others are either having ornot having the same problem and I can find a solution.Respectfully,Les Lampman [lblampman(at)bigfoot.com]Oak Harbor, Whidbey Island, WashingtonU.S.A.________________________________________________________________________________
Les,I am not sure if this is a client issue or a general list issue. I have myserver configured to reply to list, but I do allow subscribers to seeposters addresses. I am runing outlook 98 and mine behaves the same way asyou describe. If I open the message individually instead of just usingpreview mode I can see the address of the user, and can cut an past theaddr. to reply. I am also working on the Digest mode, some people wouldlike that feature.Steve E.PS. Thanks for the "attention" message to Martin. Still no word fromhim...SE-----Original Message-----LampmanSent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 7:59 AMSubject: Pietenpol-List: To Steve & All - re: email addressesHi Steve,I've noticed that in trying to reply directly to a sender of a post on theList that both the 'reply to' and 'reply to all' always pick up the Listaddress whereas the 'reply to' should only go to the original sender. Notonly that but I have found no other way to ascertain the sender's emailaddress. This makes it difficult to reply to a sender's email withoutcluttering up the List.If I am doing something wrong on my end please let me know what the problemis. I'm posting this to the List in hopes that others are either having ornot having the same problem and I can find a solution.Respectfully,Les Lampman [lblampman(at)bigfoot.com]Oak Harbor, Whidbey Island, WashingtonU.S.A.________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: To Steve & All - re: email addresses
Original Posted By:message. The first is the 'Received ' for the sender. The second is the
Greg Yotz wrote:The problem is with the 'List Server'. The list server puts two pieces ofinformation with the message that your local email viewer uses to format the
Greg Yotz wrote:The problem is with the 'List Server'. The list server puts two pieces ofinformation with the message that your local email viewer uses to format the