> > VW Info

An archive of the Matronics Pietenpol Listserve.
Locked
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

> > VW Info

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By:> > Andrew.Pietenpol(at)stpaul.com
Sounds to me if your figures are correct that the VW would be a betterengine and could even swing a larger prop than the C-65As in all cases you will find people will justify what they like even thoughother things are good. But what do I know, I am learning also. Lists I amon.VW PowerAirSoobKitFoxRagWingJodelKRStorchPietenpolFishNetGordonRW1 UL Piet BuildingPietenpol BuildingPlans I have:RW1 Piet UltraPietenpolRW2 Special PittsRW8 PT2S TrainerRW11 VagabondJ-3 CubC 150Powell P-H RacerHeath GliderRamsey Flying Bath TubLawrence Water Glideroil can wrote:> I wont even pretend to know what I'm talking about, But...>> VW engine with psru, 65 hp 65hpx5252/2330rpm=146.5 ft-lbs>> C-65 engine direct drive 65 hpx5252/2400rpm=142 ft-lbs>> Does this mean that the limiting factor of the 65 hp volkswagon engine> with psru attached is cooling, or am i missing something about torque?> I assume that in this situation both would use a nearly equal propeller.> ocb>> >From steve(at)byu.edu Thu Jan 7 05:03:05 1999> >Received: from adena.byu.edu ("port 1074"@adena.byu.edu> [128.187.22.180])> > by EMAIL1.BYU.EDU (PMDF V5.2-29 #31181)> > with ESMTP id for> oilcanbob(at)hotmail.com;> >Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 08:01:37 -0500> >From: Michael D Cuy > >Subject: VW Info> >Sender: Maiser(at)adena.byu.edu> >To: Pietenpol Discussion > >Errors-to: Steve(at)byu.edu> >Reply-to: Pietenpol Discussion > >Message-id: > >MIME-version: 1.0> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 (via Mercury MTS> v1.44 (NDS))> > (via Mercury MTS v1.44 (NDS))> >Comments: Originally To: "Pietenpol Discussion" > >X-Listname: > >> >> >> > Subj: VW Engines> > Date: Fri, Jul 24, 1998 11:57 AM EDT
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

> > VW Info

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By:> > Andrew.Pietenpol(at)stpaul.com
Certainly I'm no expert either, but the A 65 and VW 65 would not be usingthe same prop. The VW prop will be quite a lot shorter. You will have morethrust with the A 65.Thanks, Larry PasleyCarlisle, Arkansas> I wont even pretend to know what I'm talking about, But...> > VW engine with psru, 65 hp 65hpx5252/2330rpm=146.5 ft-lbs> > C-65 engine direct drive 65 hpx5252/2400rpm=142 ft-lbs> > Does this mean that the limiting factor of the 65 hp volkswagon engine > with psru attached is cooling, or am i missing something about torque? > I assume that in this situation both would use a nearly equal propeller.> ocb> > > >From steve(at)byu.edu Thu Jan 7 05:03:05 1999> >Received: from adena.byu.edu ("port 1074"@adena.byu.edu > [128.187.22.180])> > by EMAIL1.BYU.EDU (PMDF V5.2-29 #31181)> > with ESMTP id for > oilcanbob(at)hotmail.com;> >Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 08:01:37 -0500> >From: Michael D Cuy > >Subject: VW Info> >Sender: Maiser(at)adena.byu.edu> >To: Pietenpol Discussion > >Errors-to: Steve(at)byu.edu> >Reply-to: Pietenpol Discussion > >Message-id: > >MIME-version: 1.0> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 (via Mercury MTS > v1.44 (NDS))> > (via Mercury MTS v1.44 (NDS))> >Comments: Originally To: "Pietenpol Discussion" > >X-Listname: > >> >> >> > Subj: VW Engines> > Date: Fri, Jul 24, 1998 11:57 AM EDT
Locked